NAR & NWMLS Support Fair Housing with Listing Policies



There was a time, before multiple listing services existed, that brokers marketed property only through yard signs, word of mouth and individual advertising. That one-to-one marketing system limited exposure. Using code words or not, it was easy to control who was able to purchase property when property was advertised only to certain people. A buyer who was not deemed suitable by the real estate broker and the seller would never learn of the availability of the property. With the advent of the MLS, a listed property is marketed broadly, to all potential buyers, regardless of whether the buyer is known to the listing broker and regardless of what the buyer looks like or how the buyer thinks. Most MLSs introduce property to worldwide buyers through a download to various real estate internet sites through syndication and IDX feeds. The ability to expose a seller’s property to the broadest market is the very reason MLSs were created in every corner of the country.

In Washington, most residential brokers are members of NAR and/or NWMLS and most residential brokers find value in marketing residential property through the MLS to which the broker belongs. For decades, NWMLS rules have required listing brokers to input their listings in the NWMLS database for sharing with other brokers and buyers. More recently, NAR adopted a similar policy known as the Clear Cooperation Policy. These policies undeniably further fair housing goals. The policies have some key differences but the over-arching driver for both policies is the same: when a marketed property receives broad exposure, more buyers have an opportunity to purchase the property, regardless of whether the buyer knows the listing broker or not. There are benefits to sellers when more buyers view seller’s property. In very general terms, more buyers for a property will typically improve the seller’s price and terms through competitive negotiations.

Common sense suggests and history shows that the best way to provide exposure of seller’s property to the largest number of buyers and buyers who demonstrate a diversity of background and thought, is through the MLS. The MLS is the one and only central repository for information regarding the availability of real estate in a localized area. While there are lots of websites and other real estate promotional opportunities, each MLS offers the most comprehensive database of available properties within its region. It is the only reliably viable option for buyers to view property outside the presence of seller and listing broker. Thus, an MLS policy creating an obligation on listing brokers to market residential property through the MLS is a policy that promotes the goals of fair housing.

If a broker operates outside the framework of the broker’s MLS to market property, many buyers, if not most, will never know the property is available. “Pocket listings”, or as they are sometimes called, “shadow listings” or “off-market listings”, will be seen only by the buyers who are introduced to the property by the listing broker or the seller. This begs a simple question. If a property’s availability is exposed only to acquaintances of seller or listing broker, what is the likelihood that the property will be exposed to potential buyers who look and think differently from seller and listing broker? Said differently, what is the likelihood that a property which is made available only to the acquaintances of seller and listing broker will sell to a buyer who is a member of a protected class under fair housing laws? Any chance is significantly diminished as neighborhoods retain long established consistency of race, religion and other immutable characteristics.

As is the case with seemingly all industry policies these days, there is enormous controversy and confusion swirling around these MLS mandatory listing policies. Politics, personal biases, fears and uncertainty often drive frustration and anger. Cutting through all the chaos, these MLS listing policies result in a goal that every real estate broker should be able to cheer. The policies result in a market where every buyer, regardless of color, creed, religion, sexual preference, disability or any other immutable characteristic has access to purchase residential property. There should be no confusion or controversy. That is a worthy goal and policies designed to achieve that goal should be embraced by all industry members.

(Excerpt from Washington Realtors® News & Media; written by Annie Fitzsimmons, WR Legal Hotline Lawyer)

Link to the full article




A Marketplace for All: Open, Fair, Transparent and Comprehensive







For more than 40 years, Northwest MLS members have agreed to cooperate and share all properties they list for sale. Unlike other parts of the country where brokers facilitate “office exclusive” listings, which are only available to other brokers licensed with the listing firm, Northwest MLS members agree to share their residential listings with all other brokers and all potential buyers at the same time.

This open, fair, transparent, and comprehensive marketplace benefits sellers, buyers, brokers, and appraisers. The system also promotes competition and greatly supports and enhances fair housing principles.

Sellers: Exposure of listed properties to the entire marketplace through the MLS results in a higher price, better terms, and a faster sale by ensuring all potential buyers are aware of the opportunity. Complete data allows sellers and their brokers to confidently price their property based on comparable listings and sales. For sellers with specific privacy and security concerns, Northwest MLS has a myriad of tools available to address those issues. Sellers also have a range of choices about how their listing is marketed.

Buyers: Equal access to all available listed properties is critical to ensure that buyers are able to conveniently and efficiently find the most suitable property. Complete data allows buyers and their brokers to confidently make an offer based upon comparable listings and sales. Buyers are able to work with the firm and broker of choice, rather than being unfairly directed to a listing firm.  

Brokers: Listing brokers satisfy their legal duties to the seller through wide exposure of the property to the market, ensuring the highest price, best terms, and quickest sale. Listing brokers have access to a complete data set to advise sellers on pricing and other listing strategies. Buyer brokers are able to efficiently help buyers find the best property for the buyer with equal access to all available listings. Buyer brokers also have access to a complete data set to assist the buyer with making an offer based upon comparable listings and sales. 

Appraisers: Complete data empowers appraisers to efficiently and effectively appraise properties, ensuring accurate appraisals and timely closings. 

Real Estate Marketplace: The many industry partners who are essential to real estate transactions also rely on the comprehensive MLS system – including mortgage brokers, lenders, insurance companies, and title and escrow companies. Moreover economists, academics, and policy makers rely on the complete data set to better inform public policy decisions on zoning, building regulations, and related legislation and rules.

Competition: An open, fair, transparent, and comprehensive MLS system promotes competition among member firms and brokers, who compete on price and service – rather than competing by restricting knowledge of listed properties. This competitive landscape benefits consumers who are able to select the firm and broker that meets the consumer’s needs, rather than being forced to work directly with the listing firm.

Fair Housing: Private listings can have a discriminatory effect and disparate impact in violation of RCW 49.60.222 and WAC 162-36 because those listings are only available to an “exclusive” group of buyers.  Private listings are only available to those select buyers that the firm (and presumably the seller) chooses to provide information about the property. By restricting the visibility of available homes to a selected group, private listings can be fundamentally unfair and perpetuate the many inequities that have long plagued the housing system. Lisa Rice, president of the National Fair Housing Alliance, an advocacy organization in Washington, D.C., recently stated that: “[w]hen listings are confined to private channels, it becomes increasingly challenging to ensure compliance with fair housing laws designed to protect individuals from discrimination.” 
 
Northwest MLS is committed to continuing to promote and support the open, fair, transparent, and comprehensive marketplace that its members have advanced over the past 40 years. To that end, Northwest MLS will maintain and enforce its current rules that require members to input all residential listings before publicly promoting the property for sale.

(Published by the NWMLS 2/28/25)





Updated Forecast for 2025



Analysts are now anticipating just one rate cut in 2025, versus the two previously forecast. Some have even suggested that the Fed may not cut rates at all this year. This means that new homeowners and prospective buyers shouldn’t expect mortgage rate relief anytime soon. Also, with the lack of housing supply and demand expected to increase, housing prices are expected to continue to increase.





Flashback to 1995 in the Housing Market vs Today



The housing market of 2024 mirrored some striking similarities to 1995, marking the lowest existing-home sales in nearly 30 years. However, the real estate landscape has changed dramatically.

Read how…




WA REALTORS Legislative Day – January 30, 2025


On Thursday the 30th, along with almost 700 other WA Realtors, I met with Legislators in a few districts to discuss the bills we support, oppose, and why. This was extremely important as our government works to close a huge budget shortfall, but we need expanded housing options and to make homeownership more accessible and affordable in WA.

For details about WA REALTORS’ policies: https://warealtor.org/advocacy-legal/government-affairs/legislation




Building the Future Together – January 30, 2025


I’m joining other REALTORS® to help “Build the Future Together” and am preparing to meet with WA Legislators in the 30th and 47th districts Thursday, January 30th.

The 2025 Washington State Legislative Session is expected to be challenging for the real estate industry and the broader business community. With the state facing a significant budget shortfall, Washington REALTORS® will focus on addressing the state’s housing supply and affordability crisis without increasing taxes or imposing additional undue burdens on real estate.

For details about our policies: https://warealtor.org/advocacy-legal/government-affairs/legislation




A New Brokerage Name


And check out my new website: JenniferGilbert-Smith.com

3 more Designations from the National Association of Realtors


I recently completed 41 hours of continuing education and attained 3 more Designations from the National Association of Realtors to better serve my buyers and sellers!

Accredited Buyer’s Representative®
For most homebuyers, purchasing a home is the largest and most complex financial endeavor they may ever undertake. As an ABR®, I have the education, experience and skills to anticipate your needs and guide you through the home buying process. My goal is to get the best results for you, the buyer. I will help you find a home that fits your needs, style, and budget, all while providing best-in-class service.

Seller Representative Specialist
As the premier credential in seller representation, this designation is designed to elevate professional standards and enhance personal performance. As an SRS, I demonstrate the knowledge and skills essential for seller advocacy, and represent a global community of REALTORS® who use their advanced training and expertise to go above and beyond their seller’s expectations.

Seniors Real Estate Specialist®
Navigating the real estate market as a senior has unique challenges and opportunities. Whether downsizing, relocating, or adjusting to new life circumstances, an SRES® can make a significant difference. I bring specialized knowledge tailored to the over-50 market, ensuring your transaction is handled with expertise and empathy.




Let’s Vote on Energy Choice!



Time is running out to protect energy choice in Washington! Your signature is needed to make sure gas utilities continue to provide natural gas to all customers who want it.

Visit this website for details about the initiative, a super signing event this weekend, and other local signing locations: https://letsgowashington.com/i-2066-stop-the-gas-ban-protect-energy-choice/



NWMLS Position on NAR Settlement


Background

In 2019, home sellers filed two class action lawsuits (known as Moerhl and Sitzer/Burnett) against the National Association of Realtors (“NAR”) and several large brokerage franchisors.  The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants conspired to inflate commissions pursuant to a mandatory NAR rule that requires the seller, via the listing broker, to offer compensation to the buyer’s broker.

On October 31, 2023, a jury in Missouri rendered a $1.8 billion verdict in favor of the plaintiffs in Sitzer/Burnett.  Since that jury verdict, there have been more than 20 “copycat” cases filed around the country making similar claims against NAR and a variety of defendants, including brokerage firms and MLSs.

On March 15, 2024, NAR announced a proposed agreement to settle all home seller’s claims.  NAR agreed to pay $418 million to the plaintiffs over four years.  NAR also agreed to require Realtor brokers to make several “practice changes” and MLSs, who “opt-in” to the settlement, to put in place certain rule revisions for a period of seven years, in return for a release of claims. The court granted preliminary approval of the settlement on April 23, 2024, and the final approval hearing is set for November 26, 2024.

MLSs electing to join the settlement must agree to adopt the rule changes outlined in the settlement and MLSs who are not exclusively owned by Realtor associations (NWMLS is owned by its member real estate firms and not affiliated with NAR), must also make a monetary payment to the plaintiffs.  The decision to “opt-in” to the settlement must be made by June 18, 2024. 

It is important to note that the broker practice changes in the proposed settlement agreement are separate and distinct from the requirements for MLSs.  Brokers who are Realtors can participate with a MLS who has not opted-in to the settlement and still comply with the broker practice changes required by the settlement.

NWMLS Rules and Forms Revisions

NWMLS has led the industry with initiatives that afford sellers and buyers transparency, meaningful choice, and clear opportunities to negotiate their broker’s compensation. 

In 2019, NWMLS eliminated the requirement that a seller offer compensation to the buyer’s broker. At the same time, NWMLS made public the amount of compensation offered to the buyer’s broker to inform buyers of any such offer.

In 2022, NWMLS again led the industry by providing even more transparency and flexibility for buyers, sellers, and brokers. The most notable changes included:

  • “De-coupling” broker compensation, meaning that any compensation the seller chooses to offer the buyer broker is set and paid by the seller — not the listing broker; and
  • Any compensation offered by the seller to the buyer broker is prominently stated on the first page of the purchase and sale agreement, with an opportunity for that compensation to be negotiated by the buyer and the buyer’s broker.

NWMLS’s most recent consumer initiative was revising Washington’s “Agency Law” effective January 1, 2024. The new law requires brokers to enter into a written services agreement to represent either a buyer or a seller (previously only required for sellers).  All services agreements must be entered into at the outset of the parties’ relationship and comprehensively address broker compensation and details of representation.

NWMLS will not “opt-in” to NAR’s Proposed Settlement Agreement

NWMLS will not “opt-in” to NAR’s proposed settlement agreement.  NWMLS’s rules and forms, together with the revised Agency Law, provide for consumer-friendly brokerage relationships.  Sellers negotiate how much to compensate the listing firm and decide whether to offer to contribute toward the buyer’s broker compensation and the amount of any such offer.  Buyers agree how much to pay their own brokers at the outset of their relationship, and can then negotiate for the seller to help cover that cost as part of the purchase. 

NAR’s proposed settlement agreement largely duplicates the rules and practices in place in NWMLS’s service area for several years – with one notable exception.  The settlement agreement eliminates compensation transparency for buyers and restrains sellers’ choice by prohibiting sellers from making offers of compensation through the MLS.  Instead, the settlement agreement allows for offers of compensation “off MLS”, where that information is hard to find and not available to all buyers and brokers.  That change is a step in the wrong direction and is detrimental to consumers and brokers alike.

NWMLS strives to provide consumers with all relevant information about a listed property to promote efficiency, competition, and an open and free market. NWMLS’s rules and forms broaden, not limit, consumer choice and do not favor any brokerage service model or compensation structure. NWMLS allows the market to operate unimpeded by MLS rules.

NAR’s removal of compensation transparency from the MLS pushes consumers and brokers to make secret deals “off-MLS”, inviting deceptive practices, discrimination, and unfair housing.  Depriving buyers of information about the transaction risks harming buyers, especially those buyers who are already disadvantaged, including first time home buyers and members of protected classes.  Of course, prohibiting offers of compensation in the MLS also unnecessarily restrains the seller’s choice and absolute right to offer compensation to a brokerage firm representing the buyer. 

NWMLS’s Continued Evolution

NWMLS’s prior rules and forms changes significantly advanced a transparent and consumer-friendly marketplace.  NWMLS has, and will continue, to seize every opportunity to enhance the quality of real estate brokerage services in the Northwest.

Accordingly, NWMLS plans to revise its forms and listing process to ensure sellers are aware of an option that currently exists when listing a property for sale, but may not be apparent to all sellers and brokers.  In some instances, a seller may be prepared to pay compensation to a buyer broker, but may not be willing to offer a specific amount of compensation when listing the seller’s property for sale.  A seller may instead ask that the buyer include any requested amount of compensation payable to the buyer broker in the buyer’s offer.  The seller can agree to that amount or negotiate, just like any other term of the agreement.

NWMLS’s procedures are facilitated by progressive rules and forms and give consumers more choices, not fewer, and more information, not less.  A seller may choose to offer no compensation, offer a specific amount of compensation, or ask that the buyer request compensation for the buyer broker in the buyer’s offer.  These options all exist in NWMLS’s system – an open, fair, and transparent marketplace for consumers and brokers.

NWMLS expects to publish its revised forms with this clarified option for sellers in mid-August, along with other minor revisions to its forms.

Published by the NWMLS: May 28, 2024